[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaFileSystem 1.2.1 Released (Andre Carregal)
- From: Tomas Guisasola Gorham <tomas@...>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 13:24:34 -0300 (BRT)
> I like the idea and would insist that the lfs.modes bitset used the
> same terminology as the current lfs.mode string.
Sure. That is the idea!
> Other than that, it would be important to map which of the lfs.modes
> would appear as lfs.mode (even if only for backward compatibility),
> since there is apparently some priorization happening, no?
In fact, as I showed, there is no priorization because the
macros don't allow that and the function we are using (stat) will not
provide information about symbolic links.
With a new implementation, I think we should define what is the
priorization in the implementation of the deprecated mode field.