 |
lua-l archive |
|
|
||
|
I've _finally_ gotten Fink packaging to go right, also with Lua 5.1 shared library usage (this is a combination of packaging, OS X linkage thingies and Just Trying Until It Works... pheew!)
It seems, existing packages never bothered with the .so/.dylib side much, or then something's changed? Anyways, with the lua51.info file both "lua51" command line and "-llua" binding work right.
Are these file contents right (LuaBinaries please give critic?)
/sw/include/lua.h
/sw/include/lua.hpp
/sw/include/luaconf.h
/sw/include/lualib.h
/sw/lib/liblua.5.1.0.dylib
/sw/lib/liblua.5.1.dylib
/sw/lib/liblua.dylib
That is, I left 'liblua.a' static library out completely; will it be
missed? How would one anyways define between static or dynamic
linkage, by adding "liblua.a" to gcc parameters as such?
To get the lua51.info file: svn cat svn://slugak.dyndns.org/public/lua-fink/lua51.info To get my whole "development cookpot": svn co svn://slugak.dyndns.org/public/lua-fink -asko Antonio Scuri kirjoitti 24.4.2006 kello 21.49:
At 15:01 24/4/2006, Asko Kauppi wrote:Would it be possible to at least have a document (wiki page will do :) describing the needs that LuaBinaries is recommending for various packaging infrastructures. Because there _must_ :) be some.Ok. I guess we just have to adjust that information in the LuaBinaries home page. An explicit item describing package compatibility should be added.Or even a test suite to make sure, if things are available in the way LuaBinaries recommends. Such a test suite could be available using Gnu makefile, and/or some .lua files. You would benefit from it yourself, and we could stamp the fink package as "LuaBinaries approved" ;) if you may.Great idea. This is something we can do. Best, scuri