[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: 5.1
- From: Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@...>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:08:20 +0200
Glenn Maynard wrote:
The problem is that design of the language, in this area, is unintuitive
and unnatural to me. The multiple-results documentation in PiL reads like
a checklist of special cases to be memorized. I'm not saying it's something
that should or could be changed; it just feels forced.
FWIW, I consider multiple results as a very powerful and useful feature.
It feels 100% natural to me. I even miss it in C/C++.