Re: 5.1

[Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@...>]

Glenn Maynard wrote:
> The problem is that design of the language, in this area, is unintuitive
> and unnatural to me.  The multiple-results documentation in PiL reads like
> a checklist of special cases to be memorized.  I'm not saying it's something
> that should or could be changed; it just feels forced.

FWIW, I consider multiple results as a very powerful and useful feature.
It feels 100% natural to me. I even miss it in C/C++.

--
Shmuel