[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: 5.1
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@...>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:36:48 -0400
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:42:20PM +0300, Asko Kauppi wrote:
> 3. Lua is (I think) maintained with version controlling, but the
> repository is not given public access. This is the way Lua authors do
> it, and I personally appreciate it. Any changes should be sent as
> patches to the authors.
He was asking about read access ("public view")--it sounds like you're
talking about write access. Read access has nothing to do with sending
patches.
(Well, other than the fact that read access to a CVS/SVN repository makes
generating patches much easier.)
--
Glenn Maynard
