Re: Luapad

[Asko Kauppi <askok@...>]

I would see the centralized repo as the way to go.  Reason being, the  
syncing 'master' needs to be up all the time, whereas in the  
distributed scenario this is not necessarily so.
The WebDAV idea from Rici was a good one; that layer will anyhow be  
wrapped so that the underlying machinery (I use Perforce, for  
example :) wouldn't be visible.  Could Google's 1gig net disk be used?
-ak

Jamie Webb kirjoitti 19.8.2005 kello 3.14:

> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:03:33AM +0300, Asko Kauppi wrote:
>
> > - save all files on svn or cvs server
> > - syncing happens from the pad to the server, not between pad & pc as
> > today
> > - multiple users automatically supported, just log in to another svn/
> > cvs account
> All sounds very interesting. One thing I would suggest though:
> investigate truly decentralised version control systems, notably
> Darcs, Monotone, and Git. It seems unfortunate in your described
> design that all synchronisation would have to happen through a single
> net-connected server. Why can't two 'pads' exchange their changes
> directly via bluetooth, for example?
>
> -- Jamie Webb