Re: Lua+XML = forced love? (Re: FYI: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?)

[Erik Hougaard <erik@...>]

And that would be "written IN LUA"

Erik Hougaard wrote:

> Hey Guys,
>
> Please search the archives, Roberto posted a xml parser written awhile 
> back and Steve Dekorte also worte something.
>
> /Erik
>
> Asko Kauppi wrote:
>
> > What I mean by 'seamless' is really, truly, that.  Like dofile( 
> > "mydata.xml" ) and getting a Lua table returned.  Hmm.. anyone up for 
> > it?
> >
> >
> > 30.1.2005 kello 13:47, PA kirjoitti:
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 30, 2005, at 12:34, Asko Kauppi wrote:
> > >
> > > You surely meant "Lua+XML = unnatural love?" 8^)
> > >
> > > > Instead of fighting the XML world, I think it'd be best for Lua to 
> > > > be recognized as an "integrates well with XML" product.  I mean, 
> > > > reading in XML _seamlessly_ into Lua tables, and output, too.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Resistance if futile, you will be assimilated"
> > > -- The Borg
> > >
> > > > I will be needing this shortly, since working with XML in C is .. 
> > > > tedious. Anyone care to promote their favorite XML binding, I'll be 
> > > > listening. :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Looks like there is a Expat binding:
> > >
> > > http://luaforge.net/projects/luaexpat/
> > >
> > > SAX if rather low level, but perhaps that would work for you?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > --
> > > PA, Onnay Equitursay
> > > http://alt.textdrive.com/