Re: LuaPlus

[Enno Rehling <enno@...>]

Nick Trout wrote:

> > I'll check out luabind, at first glance it seems better supported than
> > LuaPlus.
>
>
> It's all hardcore template madness so you'll be at home there (so forget
> that with CodeWarrior - although I think VC can just about keep up). I
> have a feeling it's still kind of pre-alpha status though from listening
> to noise on the mailing list. 

It's not as much pre-alpha as you might think. The parts that are 
implemented work pretty much without a problem, it's just that some things 
aren't there yet. Bu tin any case, the best C++ wrappers for lua, and with 
active developers, too. We use it for our current prototype, and it's been a 
blessing.

The template stuff is definitely not for the faint of heart, and you're 
going to hate those compile times after a while. Luckily, both incredibuild 
and distcc are my friends.

Enno.
--
<xterm> The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should
     be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take
     the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?