[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: string.pack with bit resolution
- From: Sean Conner <sean@...>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:54:13 -0400
It was thus said that the Great bil til once stated:
>
> The price for "T" would be, that all the keys should best be inside your
> blob string, this will bloat up your
> blob by about 100-200 bytes in this case, quite much of course ... As your
> message string is maximum 250 bytes wide, this will bloat your blob string
> by minimum 100%, so this is quite much ... .
Um ... what?
This example:
result.id = 'SUBMIT_SM'
result.source = {}
result.dest = {}
result.service_type,
result.source.addr_ton,
result.source.addr_npi,
result.source.addr,
result.dest.addr_ton,
result.dest.addr_npi,
result.dest.addr,
result.esm_class,
result.protocol_id,
result.prority,
result.schedule_time,
result.validity_period,
result.registered_delivery,
result.replace_if_present,
result.data_coding,
result.sm_default_msg_id,
result.message,
pos = string.unpack(">zI1I1zI1I1zI1I1I1zzI1I1I1I1s1",blob,13)
Is pulled from a project at work to unpack an SMS message. What you appear
to be talking about is serializing a Lua table, which is completely
different from what I use string.pack()/string.unpack() for.
> Sorry concerning further hints from your side, which I somehow did not
> understand yet completely or which I overlooked in your blogs,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Um ... what?
> can you best
> send them also in form of such a lua code snippet, so that I see where you
> see possible problems which still cannot be handled?
> (I did not receive any Email from your side...).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Um ... what?
> Sent from: http://lua.2524044.n2.nabble.com/Lua-l-f2524044.html
From that page:
This forum is an archive for the mailing list lua-l@lists.lua.org
(more options) Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing
list.
I'm reading this via email. I'm using my email client to repond to this.
I'm not writing a "blog".
-spc
- References:
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, bil til
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, Sean Conner
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, bil til
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, bil til
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, Sean Conner
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, bil til
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, Sean Conner
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, bil til
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, Sean Conner
- Re: string.pack with bit resolution, bil til