Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)

[Sergey Kovalev <kovserg33@...>]

> I think that <toclose> is more powerful since it let you to define an
> object in a scope, but close it in another one.

do -- scope1
  local <toclose> obj1 = my_complex_object(1)
  local obj2 = my_complex_object(2)
  local <toclose> obj3
  local <toclose> obj4
  local <toclose> obj5
  do -- scope2
    obj3 = my_complex_object(3)
    obj4 = my_complex_object(4)
    obj5 = my_complex_object(5)
    obj4 = nil
    obj5 = my_complex_object(55)
 end -- end of scope 2
end -- end of scope 1

And what should be the difference in the fates of obj1, obj2, obj3,
obj4 and obj5 ?