[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
- From: pocomane <pocomane_7a@...>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 06:58:10 +0200
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:49 PM Sergey Kovalev <kovserg33@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see no problem even in this case:
>
...
>
> You use files after they have been closed. So you will have an error
> in case of real files. Don't do like this.
>
I see how to use correctly your code. What I want to stress is that it
let you to define, by mistake, a "Scope" that spawn multiple
coroutines and functions, and that can also be interrupted in the
middle of a coroutine.
This for me is an issue. However... thinking deeper... maybe the
<toclose> have a similar issue too... :(
- References:
- [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dirk Laurie
- Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sean Conner
- Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sergey Kovalev
- Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), pocomane
- Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sergey Kovalev
- Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), pocomane
- Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sergey Kovalev