[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 21:47:10 +0200
2018-04-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@gmail.com>:
>> Talking about notation - I do recall from my days of using mathematics,
>> that the index of a summation was more likely to run from 1 to n.
>
> I am not exactly sure what you mean by "using mathematics", but the use of
> index zero to denote the initial element in a series has been standard since
> at least Cauchy's Cours d'Analyse (1821), where in section 6.1 he wrote u_0,
> u_1, u_2, u_3, etc, to introduce infinite series, and three lines below, s_n
> = u_0 + u_1 + u_2 + .. + u_{n - 1} to define its partial sum.
>
> Way before any C programmers existed.
It is natural in the context of Taylor series and polynomials.
Of course, there are Laurent series too, where you start at a negative index :-)
- References:
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua, KHMan
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua, Ahmed Charles
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua, Oliver Kroth
- 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, ag
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, Francisco Olarte
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, Dirk Laurie
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, Francisco Olarte
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, Oliver Kroth
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, steve donovan
- Re: 1-based indexing in Lua or the one without zero, Viacheslav Usov