[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Patch Licensing Terms
- From: Paige DePol <lual@...>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 03:47:42 -0600
Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-11-27 4:39 GMT+02:00 Coda Highland <chighland@gmail.com>:
>
>> If you're the sole author of the code in question, you're permitted to
>> put whatever the heck license you want on it.
>
> Isn't there a license with a name like that?
Indeed there is: http://www.wtfpl.net
The title and body of the license contain profanity, if that is a concern
for anyone who may visit the site. Apparently, this license is in use for
actual projects included in various Linux distributions.
~Paige
- References:
- Patch Licensing Terms, Paige DePol
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, Jonathan Goble
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, Paige DePol
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, Sean Conner
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, Paige DePol
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, Enrico Colombini
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, Russell Haley
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, szbnwer@<a href="/cgi-bin/echo.cgi?gmail.com">...</a>
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, Coda Highland
- Re: Patch Licensing Terms, Dirk Laurie