Re: [ANN] Windows MSI Installer for PUC-Lua - Proof Of Concept

[Russell Haley <russ.haley@...>]

This is part of the 'it's all broken' comment. I only added the 64 bit binary but it puts it in x86. ‎Tee hee. 

I'll add an installer for 32 bit to my list of things todo (or an option to select platform). 

Russ

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Virgin Mobile network.

  Original Message  
From: Luiz Romário Santana Rios
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 11:41 AM
To: Lua mailing list
Reply To: Lua mailing list
Cc: joedf@ahkscript.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] Windows MSI Installer for PUC-Lua - Proof Of Concept

2017-05-14 15:07 GMT-03:00 Russell Haley <russ.haley@gmail.com>:
> Summary: I have put together a proof of concept MSI installer for PUC-Lua here:
>
> Links and Installation:
>
> Sources - https://github.com/RussellHaley/PUC-Lua-Installer
>
> Demo Installer -
> https://github.com/RussellHaley/PUC-Lua-Installer/tree/master/PUC-Lua%20Installer/bin/Debug

I just tested it on Windows xp. The installer works fine, but the Lua
binary fails to run. If you want it to run on xp, you
should set the following env var while compiling Lua:

LDFLAGS=/SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS,5.01

If you don't care about xp, though, I think the installer should fail there.

>
> License: FreeBSD
>
> Description:
>
> So a friend of mine asked for some help getting started in Lua on
> Windows and it was disappointing how disjointed the process feels. So,
> because I'm a nerd, I grabbed Mr. joedf's binary git repository and
> used the files from there to generate solution files for a Windows
> installer. It's all very hard coded and wrong and I have no pretence
> about keeping the name, but I had to call it something. It even says
> it installs 5.3.3 and installs 5.3.4!
>
> Please note that no small animals were harmed and no "paid for"
> Microsoft products were used in the making of this project. The system
> uses a free MSI toolset called WIX and I created the project using
> SharpDevelop 5.
>
> If there is any interest in me perusing this project further, my next
> steps are as follows:
>
> 0.5) Work out what it will be called
> 1) Bundle LuaRocks in the current proof of concept
> 2) Create some scripts to go wget the binaries/archives/zips and
> assemble the paths (and what not) and run the build script.
> 3) Add a "install features" element that will then use Luarocks to
> install some base features. The idea is a "curated" list of basic
> tools for a novice, who could then delve into the fabulous world of
> LuaRocks afterwards.
> 4) Figure out how or where to host the "build system" and the download
> site (GitHub? Sorceforge? Hey, it's still a thing!). OR hand the whole
> thing off to someone with more desire to maintain this (Mr. Joedf ?)
> as it's nothing but a curiosity gone horribly wrong.
>
> Still outstanding is what documentation to link to as well.
>
> Either way, comments, suggestions, insults, sticks and/or stones are welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Russell Haley
>

-- 
Luiz Romário Santana Rios