[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: LUA_INIT can replace require
- From: "Soni L." <fakedme@...>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:44:13 -0300
On 02/03/17 12:22 PM, Charles Heywood wrote:
Literally nothing? I'm confused by this thread. If you don't want to
use something, then *don't*.
It's called a rhetorical question, and you can read about them here:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:21 AM Soni L. <firstname.lastname@example.org
On 02/03/17 12:07 PM, 彭 书呆 wrote:
> 在 2017/3/2 21:21, Tony Papadimitriou 写道:
>> -----Original Message----- From: 彭 书呆
>>> maybe we can add a command line switch to disable environment
>> You mean like the -E switch since Lua v5.2?
> well, in my post I mean finer control over environment
variables, e.g. I might want to skip the
> processing of LUA_INIT but keep LUA_PATH/LUA_CPATH.
> but I think the -E switch can be enough for most cases. How come
I totally never know it before.
If you're gonna use the -E switch, what stops you from using the -e
"package.path = 'stuff here' .. package.path" switch?
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time,
with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.
Ryan <email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>>
Software Developer / System Administrator
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.