2017-03-01 3:10 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <firstname.lastname@example.org>:Quick standard questionnaire, marks from 0 to 10, 5=neutral,1. Clarity of proposal?2. New idea?3. Do opportunities for using it arise often?4. Will it improve clarity of coding?5. Efficiency?6. Attractiveness of implementation?My ratings:10, 0 (the OP himself claimed to have proposed this before April 2016 ),8, 10, 5, 2 (prefer the way suggested in ).Cloud Wu has pointed out the start of the previous thread; my referencesalso come from there.That time, only the three of us endorsed the idea. Maybe its time hasnow come. http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2016-04/msg00186.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2016-04/msg00184.html
I’m not sure of the clarity of “v.v:x.y:a.b:name(args)” .. my head spins when tings get that deeply nested. However, I do agree that a:b.c(args) does make sense, so +1 to that.