[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua and composition
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:16:50 +0200
2017-03-01 17:11 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com>:
> Pretty sure you talked about multiple colons in the post you linked.
OK, I just reread it and I did.
> You proposed, a.b.c:d.e.f:g.h.i(...) --> a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h.i(a.b.c,
> a.b.c.d.e.f, ...)
>
> I think it'd be better to have, a.b.c:d.e.f:g.h.i(...) -->
> a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h.i(a.b.c.d.e.f, a.b.c, ...)
>
> Aka inverse colon order. It's more natural/useful.
Yes, it's like Lua's arg[]. Agreed.
So the fact that I now thought, better one only, must come
from some subliminal insight that my somewhat weaker brain
at this stage could only cope with one colon :::-)