Re: About syntactic sugar v:name(args)

["Soni L." <fakedme@...>]

On 20/04/16 02:20 AM, 云风 Cloud Wu wrote:
> We know v:name(args)  is syntactic sugar for v.name 
> <http://v.name>(v,args) .
>
> Could we make this syntactic sugar more flexible ? like this :
>
> v:x.name <http://x.name>(args) -> v.x.name <http://v.x.name>(v, args)
>
> Maybe it will be more useful especially when v is an userdata with 
> complex structures.
>
> v.x can be a type object rather than a value belongs to v ( v1.x == 
> v2.x when the type of v1 is the same with v2)
I remember proposing this before, but am too lazy to look for the thread.

--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.