[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: tiobe index
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:07:10 +0200
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:05 AM, szbnwer@gmail.com <szbnwer@gmail.com> wrote:
> owe with this after i got lost, but i think it's not the right time to
> open up that box, just informed the people here who saw that scene. i
> hope i didn't kill anyone's last good vibes then and now.)
No good vibes were harmed in any way ;)
Tiobe is fairly arbitrary - I mean, for _large differences_ it's
probably ok, but any ranking below #10 is swamped by the
methodological errors.
I suppose people did not like the idea of _gaming_ the rank of Lua?
