[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies
- From: Alexey Melnichuk <alexeymelnichuck@...>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:26:28 +0300
Вы писали 23 августа 2016 г., 9:11:13:
> It was thus said that the Great steve donovan once stated:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Daurnimator <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > It's not that you assume it's bug free; but that you hope your bugs
>> > and their bugs are uncorrelated.
>> Ah, good point. An argument for a completely brain dead yet convenient
>> enough test framework.
> And still I ask---what does a framework buy you that assert() doesn't?
> Other than (in my opinion) excessive overhead on a possibly buggy framework?
> -spc (Still puzzled by all this ... )
My main reasons are:
1. More assert functions and pretty error messages.
e.g. assert_string, assert_pass e.g.
2. Test does not stop if one test case fail and continue execute next.
3. Way to do some init/cleanup tasks before each test
e.g. create table in db or create file in file system
P.S. I use lunitx one.