Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies

[Sean Conner <sean@...>]

It was thus said that the Great steve donovan once stated:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Daurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com> wrote:
> > It's not that you assume it's bug free; but that you hope your bugs
> > and their bugs are uncorrelated.
> 
> Ah, good point. An argument for a completely brain dead yet convenient
> enough test framework.

  And still I ask---what does a framework buy you that assert() doesn't? 
Other than (in my opinion) excessive overhead on a possibly buggy framework?

  -spc (Still puzzled by all this ... )