Re: Introducing luavm - Lua Version Manager

["Soni L." <fakedme@...>]

On 25/05/16 07:17 PM, Lorenzo Donati wrote:
> On 26/05/2016 00:02, Coda Highland wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Rain Gloom <raingloom42@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > > What about https://github.com/cehoffman/luaenv ?
> > > I'm asking both because of the name - luaenv is "taken" - and the 
> > > difference
> > > in functionality. One thing that's definitely better in my opinion 
> > > is the
> > > lack of an install script in luaenv. You just pull the repository 
> > > and add a
> > > line to your bashrc/zshrc/whateverelserc.
> > > If you want luarocks support, maybe it would be easier to implement 
> > > that as
> > > a module (no need to reinvent everything from the basics that way).
> > >
> > > ps.: "moonverman" sounds like a good name, according to my 
> > > calculations.
> > > Also just "verman". It's not super necessary to put "l" or "lua" or 
> > > "moon"
> > > into every package name.
> >
> > Not sure we want to name something after pests and nuisances
> > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin).
>
> Yep! I had the same feeling. Something ending in "verm" doesn't sound 
> too enticing! :-)
>
> Moreover, being Italian, it sounds worse to me. In fact "verm" is 
> almost like "vermi", which means "worms" (and yes, "vermicelli" means 
> "little worms", more or less; although they taste a little better 
> usually, depending on the cook, of course :-P :-)
That's intended. ;)
> What about "luavman"? Doesn't it sound like a superhero? :-)
>
> > /s/ Adam
>
> Cheers!
>
> -- Lorenzo
>
> P.S.: Doesn't name selection competitions look a lot like 
> bikeshedding, but with a much more cheerful attitude? :-)

--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.