Re: Missing unpack?

[David Given <dg@...>]

On 14/03/15 11:10, Dirk Laurie wrote:
[...]
> Yes.

Reportee has reported that they're using Lua 5.2.2, and that the
suggested workaround works fine, so that's sorted. Thanks!

> BTW I see you are using 5.2.1, although 5.2.4 is already out (and also
> by default turns on all compatibility switches). There are a few important
> differences, e.g. an illegal index to table.insert and table.remove is now
> an error, whereas in 5.2.1 it is silently tolerated but has undocumented
> side effects.

5.2.4 hasn't hit Debian yet (although I see that 5.2.3 has).

-- 
┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ─────
│
│ "Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from
│ malice." -- Vernon Schryver

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature