[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency
- From: Rob Kendrick <rjek@...>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:22:58 +0100
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:20:45PM +0200, Ulrich Schmidt wrote:
> MinGW is a compiler to compile native windows exe/dll and it works
> well. I used it sucessfully.
> When i stated, we need different setups for Windows and Linux i did
> not have a MS compiler in mind. For defining directory
> structure+PATH+CPATH it does _not_ matter what compiler i use.
MinGW is my compiler for choice for targetting Windows. It lets me
build software on a nice system. We successfully use it for
cross-compiling a whole web browser to Windows, and historically other
things involving Lua quite nicely.
B.
- References:
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Ulrich Schmidt
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Andrew Starks
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Ulrich Schmidt