[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Request for clarification on reserved names
- From: Lorenzo Donati <lorenzodonatibz@...>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:54:39 +0200
On 29/04/2014 03:33, Roberto Waltman wrote:
>
>> There is a language out there (I want to say one of the Algols,
>> but it's
>> rather hard to search for this example) that allows you do to:
>>
>> if if == if then then = then else else = else
>>
>> or how about:
>>
>> if then = else then else = then else else = if
>>
>
> PL/I, maybe others. An attempt to keep your sanity is here:
> http://pliedit.com/
Of course, in order to to help color blind people, there would also be a
screen reader plugin which would read keywords with a different
intonation (we are in the era of multimedia, after all...).
And what about having different semantics according to the specific
/font variant/ used to write code? Surely MS comic sans would fit well
for comments and Liberation mono would be perfect for string literals.
Oh, happy new world ... :o) ;-) :-D
> This example should be enough to kill any proposal making keywords
> "reusable".
>
> --
> Roberto Waltman
>
-- Lorenzo
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
- References:
- Request for clarification on reserved names, Hisham
- RE: Request for clarification on reserved names, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Hisham
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Coroutines
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, steve donovan
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Coroutines
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Sean Conner
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Robert Virding
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Roberto Waltman