[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Request for clarification on reserved names
- From: Paige DePol <lual@...>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:51:11 -0500
On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:33 PM, Roberto Waltman <techie@rwaltman.com> wrote:
>> There is a language out there (I want to say one of the Algols, but it's
>> rather hard to search for this example) that allows you do to:
>>
>> if if == if then then = then else else = else
>>
>> or how about:
>>
>> if then = else then else = then else else = if
>
> PL/I, maybe others. An attempt to keep your sanity is here: http://pliedit.com/
> This example should be enough to kill any proposal making keywords "reusable".
> --
> Roberto Waltman
I do not believe I have ever used a language in which the keywords were also usable for variable names, and after reading that mess above, I don't believe I would ever want to. I would put reuse of keywords right up there with significant whitespace as far as "bad" language features go!
~pmd~
- References:
- Request for clarification on reserved names, Hisham
- RE: Request for clarification on reserved names, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Hisham
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Coroutines
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, steve donovan
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Coroutines
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Sean Conner
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Robert Virding
- Re: Request for clarification on reserved names, Roberto Waltman