[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Paul Merrell <marbux@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:55:23 -0700
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Coroutines <coroutines@gmail.com> wrote:
> I forget what type of argument it's called when one speculates to the
> imaginable worst of a proposal to justify not changing anything,
reductio ad absurdum. <http://www.iep.utm.edu/reductio/>.
Best regards,
Paul
--
[Notice not included in the above original message: The U.S. National
Security Agency neither confirms nor denies that it intercepted this
message.]
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):