[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: TypedLua
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:41:28 +0200
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Andrew Starks <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It's one of those things that comes up and I have this thought. When I do,
> I'm never left thinking that there are a ton of ways to extend value types.
> I'm always left thinking, "any one of these ways would be fine and if there
> was just one, things could be much easier to parse."
Well, 'extended types' are concepts built on the lower-level Lua
mechanisms, and like 'class' implementations, there will always be
multiple ways of achieving that. It would be useful if we had a
virtual summit meeting and established some conventions, but it's hard
for cats to herd.