[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey)
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:06:27 -0500
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Paul K <paulclinger@yahoo.com> wrote:
> which means that #t *may* return non-zero
> results on tables that don't have *any* array part.
I don't think that this is true, and if it is, I'm totally screwed
because I've been writing some subtly buggy code.... :)
-Andrew
- References:
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Dirk Laurie
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Paul K
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Tim Hill
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), steve donovan
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Paul K
