[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey)
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 22:51:44 -0300
> I still feel the lack of an efficient way to determine if a table t is a sequence is a significant hole in the language/runtime.
Why would you need that? If you care that a table is a sequence, then either
you have created the table and know it or you have been handed a table and
can assume whoever gave you the table honors the contract with you to use
only sequences. What am I missing?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), steve donovan
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Tim Hill
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Pierre Chapuis
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Marc Lepage
- References:
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Dirk Laurie
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Paul K
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Tim Hill