[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey)
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:03:29 +0200
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
<lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> Why would you need that? If you care that a table is a sequence, then either
> you have created the table and know it or you have been handed a table
That's the voice of reason, I think; these things should be documented ;)
There are tedious-but-sure methods of finding the 'hash' part
(non-array) but they are not quick and rarely needed except when
pretty-printing arbitrary tables.
steve d.
- References:
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Dirk Laurie
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Paul K
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Tim Hill
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo