lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:06 AM, steve donovan <> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Miles Bader <> wrote:
>> One thing I've run into with Lua 5.3-work1 is that I want to make code
>> which is portable between different versions of Lua, and while this is
>> usually pretty easy by simply using runtime tests, one can't use
>> anything which is invalid syntax in earlier Lua versions, like the
>> "//" operator.
> I share Miles' concern here. This is the first serious break with Lua 5.1
> after more than eight years - like a Python 3 moment. I understand that
> people sometimes need 64-bit integer arithmetic (which is why his proposed
> idiv won't in general work) but it's a very specific point to choose to
> break with the past.
> steve d.

Since Lua reached the point of syntax (backward) incompatibility would
it be better to call it Lua-6.0 rather than Lua-5.3?