[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: smartlua
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:12 +0200
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:08 AM, John Labenski <jlabenski@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't believe I've seen this, is there anything wrong with doing
> this and why isn't it done now?
LuaRocks has always had support for strict versioning, if you allow it
to patch your require:
http://luarocks.luaforge.net/luadoc/modules/luarocks.require.html
But most users found it fussy and just wanted things to work, poor things.
- References:
- Proposal: smartlua, Stefan Reich
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Christian Bielert
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Peter Drahoš
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Peter Drahoš
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Steve Litt
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, marbux
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, mchalkley
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Peter Drahoš
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Michal Kottman
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, John Labenski