Re: fine-grained lua_pcall() error processing

[Miles Bader <miles@...>]

petah <lua@laufenberg.ch> writes:
> LuaJIT isn't on our radar; over ~5 years we've had only one
> interpreted Lua bottleneck (gigantic memory requirements) which was
> solved in a few minutes by a custom type implemented in C++.

... and note that LuaJIT actually reduces the amount of memory you can
use (compared to the standard interpreter)!

-miles

-- 
永日の　澄んだ紺から　永遠へ