[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?
- From: "Pierre Chapuis" <catwell@...>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:19:21 +0100
>> On 7 March 2013 21:31, Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com> wrote:
>> Time spent making language X work like language Y is not productive,
>> just use language Y and be done with it.
>
> The same argument is valid for mruby, is it not? Why are you using a
> stripped down version of Ruby when you are just trying to reimplement
> Lua? :)
This. You can work around most of the missing features of Ruby in Lua.
It is way harder to work around the missing features of Lua in Ruby when
those include size, portability and performance.
--
Pierre Chapuis
- References:
- What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Muqtheear S
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Ico
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Andrew Starks
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Mark Gabby
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Peter Hickman
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Rob Kendrick
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Peter Hickman
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Steve Litt
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Peter Hickman
- Re: What Lua can do that other programming languages can't do?, Roberto Ierusalimschy