[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?
- From: Steve Litt <slitt@...>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:55:57 -0500
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:46:50 -0200
Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> > As a matter of fact, Lua's syntax is one of the most common
> > complaints about it.
>
> That is easy :) Most people never really used the language, so they
> cannot complain about anything else (such as arrays starting at 1,
> the absence of bitwise operations, global by default, no bateries
> included, ...).
No continue statement not involving a label
--Litt ducks and runs
- References:
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Ross Bencina
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Joseph Manning
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Miles Bader
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Steve Litt
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Miles Bader
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Michael Richter
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, William Sumner
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Michael Richter
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, William Sumner
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Roberto Ierusalimschy