Re: Qt or Gtk?

[Coda Highland <chighland@...>]

On the flip side, Qt's got pretty good support for cross-compilation,
so there's a point in that favor, as long as we're weighing the
options.

/s/ Adam

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Glenn Schmottlach
<gschmottlach@gmail.com> wrote:
> If if you're interested in cross-compiling lgi (like me) to use on an
> embedded Linux target device then you'll likely need to look for another
> toolkit because lgi relies on gobject introspection and the resulting
> typelibs. Unfortunately, these typelibs are not portable across CPU
> architectures (like x86 to ARM) which obviously is something you need when
> cross-compiling. See the following link for more details if it concerns you:
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/PeterPearse/GobjectIntrospection
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm likely wrong but I think the QT runtime is quite a bit larger than
>> GTK? Although both are fairly large anyway...
>>
>> On 2012-09-14 4:12 AM, "sergei karhof" <karhof21@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Any downsides with either? (again, from a Lua perspective)
>>>
>