Re: Qt or Gtk?

[Laurent FAILLIE <l_faillie@...>]

I confirm that LGI is very easy to use and efficient (see a previous thread I initiated on this ML).

In few development days, I did a good (at least for my needs) tool using SOAP /  LGI / GTK+ ... I have to find some time to build a comprehensive documentation and then present it to this list.

Bye

 

The misspelling master is on the Web.
_________ 100 % Dictionnary Free !
/ /(
/ Dico / / Pleins d'autres fautes sur
/________/ /
(#######( / http://destroyedlolo.info
Quoi, des fautes d'orthographe! Pas possible ;-D.

---

From: Craig Barnes <craigbarnes85@gmail.com>
To: Lua mailing list <lua-l@lists.lua.org>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: Qt or Gtk?

If you're using and developing for Linux/Unix systems, GTK+ is just
fine (and IMO a much better experience than Qt). There's also a very
nice Lua binding for GTK+3 called LGI [1].

If you need to be cross-platform, Qt is probably a better choice as
GTK+ looks "non-native" on Windows/Mac and support is quite often
falling behind (most of the developers seem to be Unix people).

[1]: https://github.com/pavouk/lgi