[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
- From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:56:15 -0500
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@gmail.com> wrote:
> And in
> a sense, computer language design is a HCI.
in a sense, but not in all.
for starters, a programming language is supposed to make the human
side do some work.
every language has tradeoffs. the Lua authors long made the choice to
favor minimalism, performance and mathematical elegance over
newbie-friendliness and intuitive concepts.
that doesn't mean decisions can't be revised; but this thread hasn't
proposed anything that hasn't been evaluated and rejected several
times already.
--
Javier
- References:
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Joseph Manning
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), joao lobato
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), joao lobato
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Eduardo Ochs
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Axel Kittenberger