[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Microlight (was Re: paving cowpaths with libraries)
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:59:52 +0200
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Ross Bencina
> naming seems logical to be except for:>
> callable() -> is_callable()
Right, in fact the original penlight function _is_ called is_callable!
> Is there a reason to supply bind1 rather than a generalised bind() for any
> number of arguments?
Generalized bind functions are not easy to write, although I've seen
some impressive solutions on the wiki. (They aren't short, and there
is a cost!) There is a generalized bind in Penlight using placeholder
n=1 takes you more than half the way ;)