[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: verification and linting of lua implementations
- From: Alessandro Delgado <adelgado1313@...>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:38:54 -0200
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Florian Weimer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> * Thomas Buergel:
>> Perhaps it might be worth to register Lua for Coverity Scan?
> So that Coverity claims in a press release that Lua contains 88
> high-risk defects? I'm not sure if this is such a great idea.
So we could patch 'em? I, for one, am sure it is.
But let's not get into a flamewar about Full Disclosure. Specially
since anyone who doens't like it is so obviously wrong. :P