[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: S.W.O.T analysis
- From: Jimmie Houchin <jlhouchin@...>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:52:51 -0500
On 10/19/2011 7:12 AM, steve donovan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Mc(avery
If Python runs something in 200ms and Lua runs it in 50ms I don't
still a blink of an eye.
Ah, but many of us work with dinky little processors, and even now
that smartphones are more powerful than 70s mainframes, you still have
the iron law that inefficiency is costly in power use. Battery
evolution has been fantastic, but there are limits.
Python is so much easier to learn then Lua
Not sure how generally true that is. If we took some young noobs and
gave them a feature-rich Lua environment, then I think there's less
gotchas than in Python, which has so many types and special syntax to
handle them. ('feature-rich' is however the catch!)
I agree. I use Python regularly because I am familiar with it. It has
lots of libraries. But I never use it long enough to become really good
at it, because it is too easy to bang your head against syntax issues.
Its been too long, so I don't remember what they are.
Lua on the other I believe is simpler and much more consistent. I
believe Lua the language can be reasonably understood and potentially
mastered. Now I mean that withing the context of your use. I am not a C
user, so I would not necessarily understand embedding or using those
I would dearly love Lua to have sufficient libraries to reduce or
eliminate any need or desire for me to use Python.
It wouldn't have to be a part of Lua proper, (core/kernel/...?). But
could simply be a Lua distribution which is full featured.
Is this "feature-rich" Lua environment available anywhere?
I am presently using Lua for Windows. I don't know what Python has that
it doesn't. From brief usage of the Lua interpreter or the iLua (Lua
Friendly Command Line), it seems much more primitive than any of the
Python interpreters, especially IPython.
I also haven't seen any IDE which is as friendly as PyDev. Scite is not
bad, and it could be better. One nice thing is that Scite is not a big
memory hog, like most Java based IDEs. I am primarily talking about the
I think Lua hits a pretty nice sweet spot.
When I watch videos like
Clojure's Rich Hickey, www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-Easy
or Stuart Holloway,
I think a feature-rich Lua both in environment and libraries could be an
excellent solution for solving problems in a manner Rich Hickey describes.
I do not know how far or how close Lua is to any of this. But I do know
that the Lua out of the box experience isn't as feature-rich as other
languages. I don't know how to get my environment there. And I think
that is a shame, because Lua is a beautiful language.
I am open to learning anything that gets my Lua setup and experience
closer to what I can experience in Python. And actually I find the
Python experience primitive, as I am a long time Smalltalker. :)