Re: [ANN] mergelua

[Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@...>]

On Oct 17, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:

> Even in Lua 5.1 many
> (most?) modules follow that policy without using the 'module' function.

Pure speculation on your part?

Lets see... random selection... LuaSocket? ah, uses module... LuaJIT? Oh, module again... LuaRocks? module... CGILua? oh my... module again... I guess my sample is as representative as yours...

Plus this is really a self defeating argument... would you not  w a n t to have more Lua modules?!?