On 13 October 2011 13:47, Patrick Mc(avery
<patrick@spellingbeewinnars.org> wrote:
I like the idea of truncating over the randomness of attempts to represent full words with less letters. I like the idea of prefixing names from the library code they were called from(although my previous examples did not obey this) but a single truncating value might not work.
The number that the include file ends in would match the truncation of characters in it's variable name prefixes. I should also mention that I am planning on writing a large number of tiny functions(perhaps 1000) so this naming convention issue is quite import to keep order.
Why would you need to have a number in the include filename? Are you planning to support function aliases with different prefix lengths?
