Re: Announcement: The birth of Ophal Project

[steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jerome Vuarand
<jerome.vuarand@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO the original name is very nice. It has the benefit of not being a
> common name.

I have to agree with Jerome here; search-ability is important.

Also, 'ophal' is not _pronounced_ like 'offal'; by the usual rules of
English pronunciation, the 'o' will be long, not short.  That is, it
sounds like 'oh-fal', not 'offl'.

steve d.