[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: Constant Tables
- From: David Given <dg@...>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 20:30:47 +0100
On 13/08/11 19:53, Lorenzo Donati wrote:
> Really? This comes new to me! You mean that some snippets could be, say,
> GPLed and could have been fed to the community without a warning?
> What is the implicit license if someone doesn't declare one then?
In theory, none --- without a license, the code cannot be redistributed
In practice, stuff sent to a mailing list is presumed to have an
implicit license allowing it to be used in a reasonable manner, so
nobody cares if we reuse small snippets of code. For anything
substantial --- and yes, the definition of 'reasonable' and
'substantial' does depend on how well paid your lawyers are --- it is
important to be more careful.
Um... this advice is redistributable under the terms of the CC0 Creative
Commons License (all rights possible waived).
┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ─────
│ "I have a mind like a steel trap. It's rusty and full of dead mice."
│ --- Anonymous, on rasfc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature