|
On 13/08/2011 20.33, Rob Kendrick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 06:28:38PM +0200, Lorenzo Donati wrote:On 13/08/2011 15.36, Lars Doelle wrote: [...]-- ------------------------------------------------------ -- [ToData.lua] -- Copyright (c) 2011 Lars Dölle<lars.doelle@on-line.de> -- ------------------------------------------------------[...] Please, avoid posting copyrighted material, even if the copyright is yours. It is very bad netiquette.Everything posted to this list is copyrighted, explicitly labeled or otherwise.
Really? This comes new to me! You mean that some snippets could be, say, GPLed and could have been fed to the community without a warning?
What is the implicit license if someone doesn't declare one then?
Yes, I know that there are some jurisdiction mismatches across countries, sadly we cannot do anything about it :-(I don't like having in my mail archive copyrighted material with unknown license which I haven't asked for. Since you are new to the list I assume it was a mistake, but remember that snippets posted to the list are assumed to be public domain.Most legal jurisdictions do not have a concept of "public domain" that people can simply place new creations under.
Sorry, but this is really bad news. So if I asked for help and someone sent me on this list a snippet to solve the problem then my code could have been "infected" with unknown licensing term?!?By default, you have no rights to do anything what-so-ever with material sent to you.
Yes, of course. I wasn't worried really about archiving, but later unintentional "reusing".I would like to see a court rule against somebody for archiving unsolicited content sent to them, though!
B.
-- Lorenzo