[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: No lfs for 5.2 yet?
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:21:11 +0200
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
<lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> #define luaL_reg luaL_Reg
In fact, no rebuilding necessary - just put that #define in lfs.c and
then either
(a) accept that there is no longer a global 'lfs' table
(b) write a little bit of C that makes the global 'lfs' table for compatibility
(a) is easy to live with, I think; most of us tend to do this anyway:
local lfs = require 'lfs'
steve d.
