[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: No lfs for 5.2 yet?
- From: Dirk Laurie <dpl@...>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:19:06 +0200
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:21:11AM +0200, steve donovan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> > #define luaL_reg luaL_Reg
> In fact, no rebuilding necessary - just put that #define in lfs.c and
> then either
> (a) accept that there is no longer a global 'lfs' table
> (b) write a little bit of C that makes the global 'lfs' table for compatibility
> (a) is easy to live with, I think; most of us tend to do this anyway:
> local lfs = require 'lfs'
Thanks, Steve. That idea will probably take care as well of most of the
other modules around that won't work under 5.2.