Re: PUC Lua

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> People like calling the original, 'vanilla' and all kinds of tender
> names. Trying to write neutral stuff, I keep falling back to talk
> about "Lua" and "LuaJIT", which technically makes no sense but
> intuitively seems to be the least confusing and bloated way to make
> the distinction.

Why does it make no sense?  As already pointed out, Lua is the name
of both the language *and* our implementation. So, when talking about
implementations, "Lua" is the correct term.

-- Roberto