[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: PUC Lua
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:10:18 -0300
> People like calling the original, 'vanilla' and all kinds of tender
> names. Trying to write neutral stuff, I keep falling back to talk
> about "Lua" and "LuaJIT", which technically makes no sense but
> intuitively seems to be the least confusing and bloated way to make
> the distinction.
Why does it make no sense? As already pointed out, Lua is the name
of both the language *and* our implementation. So, when talking about
implementations, "Lua" is the correct term.