On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:49 PM, KHMan wrote:
On 3/29/2011 9:13 AM, Alexander Gladysh wrote:
Recent discussion about module() function reminded me of a
question I
wanted to ask for some time.
I keep stumbling upon or hearing about a plethora of hacks
that people
do to reuse LuaDoc for their code. (I, myself, never tried
to use it
actually — being scared off by all these hacks.)
So, I have a question: why hack around and why not to fix
the tool (or
write a new one for that matter)?
I've been wondering too... add Lua support to Doxygen and
everyone gets easy access to a mature and widely-available
documentation tool. Have anyone tried going the Doxygen route?
[snip]
Doxygen is also large and cumbersome.
Since Lua is so dynamic I don't think it lends itself to existing
documentation systems. That's a purely arbitrary statement though,
I'd be interested if somebody had actually tried this.